.svg)
X
X
X
You no longer have any choice but to adapt AI securely. And the NIST AI RMF is now the bar.
But if you’re leading product security or AppSec, the reality is this: you’re expected to move fast, enable innovation, and manage AI risk all at once. The NIST AI Risk Management Framework gives you a solid structure, but it’s not built with your day-to-day in mind. It’s dense, high-level, and doesn’t plug easily into CI/CD or developer workflows.
Meanwhile, leadership wants proof that you’re doing AI securely. Compliance asks how you’re handling bias, explainability, and governance. And your team? They’re already stretched thin trying to keep up with releases, threat modeling, and AI adoption across multiple teams.
You’re no longer just securing infrastructure, apps, or data. You’re now responsible for how your teams assess, design, and deploy AI systems. The RMF is becoming the go-to benchmark for secure and trustworthy AI, and if you’re not aligned, the questions from legal, compliance, and customers are going to pile up fast.
The problem is how un-operational the framework is. Yes, it’s comprehensive, but it doesn’t map neatly to the tools or workflows your teams already use. It sets expectations but leaves the how up to you. And that’s where most security leaders are stuck today: the goals are clear, but the execution isn’t.
Why CISOs should care
AI decisions are business decisions… and risk decisions. When an AI model goes off the rails or leaks sensitive data, it’s not just a technical failure. It’s reputational, legal, and financial damage.
That’s why NIST AI RMF is getting traction. It gives external stakeholders (legal, compliance, even the board) a language to talk about AI risk. And it puts new pressure on CISOs and AppSec leaders to show how you’re governing these systems proactively.
You’re now expected to:
This has become the baseline for doing business with AI responsibly, especially in regulated industries or public-facing platforms.
The framework has four pillars: Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage. Here's what they actually mean for AppSec teams:
Governance in AI means defining who is responsible for what risk and enforcing that throughout the lifecycle. From model design to deployment, someone has to own decisions like:
You need real insight into model behavior, data flows, and threat scenarios or your governance is just paper.
Map means identifying how the AI system functions: what inputs it takes, what decisions it makes, and how it integrates into your stack. For security teams, this often gets skipped or over-simplified.
But mapping is where most risk exposure hides:
If you can’t map the architecture, threat modeling AI becomes a guessing game, and security reviews happen too late to be useful.
This is about tracking and controlling risk over time. Are your models drifting? Are new attack surfaces showing up as data or code changes? Traditional AppSec tools don’t give you this kind of visibility.
Managing AI securely requires continuous feedback loops and threat models that evolve with the system. That means automation, context, and workflows that keep pace with releases.
Compliance checklists, pen tests, and point-in-time assessments won’t cut it here. They miss the nuanced risks that come from how AI systems are built, trained, and deployed.
Static security controls don’t give you answers to questions like:
You need risk-driven visibility with continuous and contextual analysis integrated into design and development, not bolted on after the fact.
The NIST AI RMF raises the bar on how you think about and manage AI risk. And security teams that can operationalize it will be the ones who stay ahead of audits, breaches, and internal fire drills.
Just because you’re aligning with the NIST AI RMF doesn’t mean hiring a new team or launching a months-long project. Instead, you’re putting risk ownership, threat visibility, and decision-making into your existing workflows in a way that actually scales. That’s where we45’s Threat Modeling as a Service (TMaaS) comes in.
TMaaS maps directly to the RMF pillars: Govern, Map, Measure, Manage, and deliver security outcomes your teams can act on immediately.
Let’s walk through how it works and what it gives you.
When you’re responsible for governing AI systems, the hard part is getting the policies enforced. You can’t govern what you can’t see, and you can’t enforce what you haven’t defined clearly.
Traditional threat modeling requires you to reinvent the wheel for every application. TMaaS gives you pre-mapped control logic tied to threat categories already aligned with RMF risk categories.
You stop wasting time debating what "acceptable use" means for every AI implementation. Instead, you get consistent risk policies that scale across teams.
A financial services customer used TMaaS to review a proposed genAI implementation. The model identified that the system lacked output monitoring and content filtering, critical controls for preventing data leakage and toxic outputs.
What happened afterward? They rejected the implementation before it hit production, avoiding a potential regulatory nightmare.
Most teams don’t have a clear picture of how AI features plug into their architecture, and that’s a risk in itself. Mapping is where security blind spots start to surface.
TMaaS consumes your existing artifacts: OpenAPI specs, architecture diagrams, and user stories, and extracts threat models automatically. You don’t need to schedule a diagram-drawing session or wait three weeks. You get the model (and the risks) within 24 hours.
Input:
Output:
Traditional threat modeling often stops here are all the possible bad things. That’s not helpful when you need to decide what to fix or explain why something’s a no-go to your bosses.
Generic threat models tell you what could happen. TMaaS tells you what matters:
This gives you evidence for controls instead of fear-based justification. You can prioritize what actually reduces risk and stop chasing theoretical threats at the same time.
A CISO at a global SaaS company used TMaaS to evaluate an LLM-based internal tool. The output flagged prompt injection and overexposure of sensitive internal data. The report laid out the business impact in clear terms, giving the CISO what they needed to pause the rollout and get executive alignment fast.
This is how you move from gut calls to risk-informed decisions.
You need threat modeling to happen continuously and outputs that your teams can actually use.
TMaaS delivers outputs in dev-ready formats, including backlog items and remediation steps. There will be no PDFs that sit in a folder and files nobody reads. Instead, your teams will have actionable stories that they can plug into Jira, GitHub, or wherever they work.
A FinTech security team was spending 3+ weeks on each threat model. After implementing TMaaS, they cut that cycle to under 24 hours while meeting RMF Manage expectations.
Their developers stopped seeing security as a blocker and started treating it as a feature. Adoption skyrocketed because the process actually worked with their timeline.
we45’s Threat Modeling as a Service (TMaaS) focuses on outcomes: faster cycles, broader coverage, consistent output, and audit-ready artifacts. It’s how you embed RMF principles into how your teams build and release software.
Traditional threat modeling cycles take one to three weeks per system if you can even find the right people to do it. That delay either blocks release or gets skipped entirely but with TMaaS, you’re eliminating that tradeoff.
TMaaS delivers AI-aware threat models in 24 hours or less. That means you get actionable results in time for sprint planning instead of getting it after the code is already shipped. When the RMF says continuous risk management, this is what it looks like in practice.
Business impact:
That speed comes from SecurityReviewAI, our in-house AI system that parses your design artifacts, APIs, and architecture to generate a first-pass threat model in minutes. It automates the tedious parts of threat modeling so our engineers can focus on validation, prioritization, and real-world context. The result: no lag, no boilerplate, and no missed deadlines.
AI systems don’t follow traditional architecture patterns. They include third-party APIs, inference endpoints, custom prompts, and pipelines that change with every sprint. You can’t manage that complexity with static questionnaires or manual walkthroughs.
TMaaS analyzes real application artifacts that let you see actual attack surfaces. It also highlights what’s missing: inputs without validation, outputs without monitoring, and flows without access control.
This is how you reduce blind spots in systems that move too fast for manual review.
Without a standardized approach, every threat model depends on who’s doing the work. One team might over-index on low-risk threats, another might miss critical gaps. That kind of inconsistency undermines your RMF alignment and makes you look unprepared during audits.
TMaaS delivers threat models based on the same structured logic, across every language, stack, and team. Whether it’s a Python ML service or a Go backend using OpenAI’s API, every team gets the same depth, rigor, and format.
Why this matters:
When it’s time to show how you govern and manage AI risk, you don’t want to dig through old tickets, half-written Confluence pages, or tribal memory. RMF-aligned documentation is required.
TMaaS generates clear and structured outputs mapped to RMF sections. You get threat models with risk logic, decision justifications, and mitigation actions, all packaged in a format that works for security reviews, executive briefings, or audit responses.
This gives you:
Plenty of vendors are now promising AI risk management or trustworthy AI. But when you dig deeper, most of them are selling a dashboard, a policy framework, or some automated scanner. That’s not enough especially if you’re accountable for AI risk across multiple product teams, stacks, and release cycles.
we45’s Threat Modeling as a Service is built by actual security engineers who’ve worked inside fast-moving product teams. It’s designed to deliver risk clarity, and it’s built to scale without forcing your teams to slow down, retrain, or retool.
Get a walkthrough of how we45 delivers RMF-aligned threat models in 24 hours across AI, APIs, and full-stack applications. See how your specific AI use cases map to the framework without adding overhead to your security program.
Stop treating AI security as a special case. Start treating it as a solvable problem.
we45’s Threat Modeling as a Service (TMaaS) helps you operationalize the four pillars of the NIST AI RMF (Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage) using actionable threat models. You get clear documentation, prioritized risks, and mitigation guidance tailored to AI systems. The result: you meet RMF requirements without slowing down your release cycles.
Most tools generate static, generic outputs. TMaaS combines automation with expert review to deliver context-rich threat models specific to your architecture, AI stack, and business logic. It’s built for teams that need both speed and depth.
You provide whatever your teams already have — OpenAPI/Swagger files, architecture notes, user stories, or design docs. No need to build new diagrams or change your workflow. TMaaS parses these to generate accurate threat models and risk analysis.
TMaaS delivers results in 24 hours or less. That includes AI-generated models, manual validation by security engineers, and delivery of prioritized findings and mitigation steps, all ready for sprint planning or risk reviews.
Yes. TMaaS includes threat categories tailored to AI/ML systems, including risks related to training data, model inference, output validation, third-party LLMs, and prompt injection. These are mapped to RMF categories and prioritized by impact.
Absolutely. TMaaS is already being used by Fortune 500 companies to model risk across 100+ applications. It standardizes risk reviews across languages, teams, and pipelines without creating a bottleneck.
Yes. TMaaS works with tools you already use: Jira, Confluence, GitHub, and others. Outputs are designed to fit directly into developer backlogs and documentation workflows, not live in static PDFs.
TMaaS works for both. While it’s designed to address AI-specific risks, it also covers full-stack application threat modeling. It’s ideal for environments where AI is part of a broader product ecosystem.
TMaaS delivers audit-ready artifacts mapped to NIST AI RMF sections. You get structured documentation, risk justification, and mitigation evidence, all aligned with governance and compliance needs. No scrambling for evidence when regulators or customers ask.
TMaaS can support or augment your internal process. Some teams use it to validate internal work; others use it to scale across teams that don’t have in-house security support. Either way, you get consistent, high-quality output fast.
.png)