Security for containers doesn't have to be very complicated. Building your "Container Shield"—a useful security system that safeguards your containerized programs throughout their lifecycle—is explained in this guide. We will discuss how to scan Docker and Kubernetes systems, assess well-known technologies, registries like AWS ECR, and discuss practical best practices that strike a compromise between security and DevOps pace. You will uncover practical insights to improve your container security posture immediately, regardless of whether you are a hands-on security engineer or a developer.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
2. The Container Vulnerability Challenge
3. Building Your Container Shield: A Lifecycle Defense System
4. Choosing the Right Tools: A Practical Guide
5. Real-World Lessons and Best Practices
6. Conclusion

Introduction

Imagine this: Just now, your team used containers to ship an important software upgrade. Until someone brings up Log4j, everyone is rejoicing about the deployment's success. All of a sudden, you're rushing to figure out which of your hundreds of containers may be at risk, where they're operating, and how soon you can patch them.

Sound familiar?

Containerized apps are deployed and updated at lightning speed in the current DevOps environment. The cost of this agility is that security teams have to defend these dynamic environments, which include cloud registries, Docker images, and Kubernetes clusters, from an endless stream of emerging vulnerabilities.

Simply scanning a container image once and moving on is insufficient. A lifecycle strategy is necessary for effective container security, including vulnerability management into each stage from development to production.

‍

The Container Vulnerability Challenge

“My team had diligently scanned every image in our CI pipeline, but months later, we still got breached through a seemingly minor vulnerability.” The problem? You focused on point-in-time scanning but missed the ongoing lifecycle management.

Containers aren't static servers. They're dynamic building blocks in a constantly evolving environment:

• Developers pull base images and add application code
• CI systems build and test new images continuously
• Registries store and distribute these images
• Orchestrators like Kubernetes deploy containers across clusters
• New vulnerabilities emerge in previously "clean" images

This creates unique challenges:

"Recent findings show an alarming 87% of container images running in production have high or critical vulnerabilities, up from 75% a year prior."

The problem often isn't a lack of scanning tools—it's failing to implement vulnerability management throughout the entire container lifecycle. When a new critical CVE drops, can you confidently identify every affected container and quickly roll out patches? Most organizations struggle here.

The NIST Application Container Security Guide (SP 800-190) emphasizes this lifecycle approach, warning specifically about "stale images" accumulating unpatched flaws over time. A proper container security program must address vulnerabilities at every stage:

1. During image build (CI/CD)
2. In your registry
3. At deployment time
4. While running in production
5. When new vulnerabilities emerge

To maintain security across the container lifecycle, it's crucial to implement essential security controls for container registries. These controls help enforce image trust, automate scanning, and detect tampering early in the CI/CD pipeline.

Let's explore how to build defenses at each stage.

‍

Building Your Container Shield: A Lifecycle Defense System

1. Build Stage: Catching Vulnerabilities Early (with SBOM Attestation)

A team once prevented a major incident because their CI pipeline caught a critical OpenSSL vulnerability during the build phase. The developer was grateful—fixing it after deployment would have triggered a midnight emergency response.

This is the power of "shift-left" scanning: catching issues when they're easiest and cheapest to fix.

Practical implementation:

• Add a scanning step in your CI/CD pipeline that runs automatically with every build
• Generate and sign Software Bill of Materials (SBOMs) using tools like Syft and Cosign for provenance.
• Configure the scanner to fail builds with critical/high severity vulnerabilities
• Start with lenient policies and gradually tighten them as your team adjusts

‍

Here's a real GitHub Actions example:

‍

- name: Scan Docker image  
  run: trivy image --severity HIGH,CRITICAL --exit-code 1 myapp:build-${{ github.sha }}  
  
  syft myapp:build-${{ github.sha }} -o json > sbom.json  
  cosign attest --key cosign.key --type=sbom --predicate=sbom.json myapp:build-${{ github.sha }}

  

‍

This simple step prevents vulnerable images from even reaching your registry. For sensitive environments, consider "inline scanning" where the image is scanned directly within the build pipeline without pushing it anywhere first.

2. Registry Stage: Your Security Control Point

Teams operating without registry scanning spent numerous days searching through their systems for all Log4j occurrences after the Log4Shell vulnerability appeared. Teams with registry scanning systems executed a short query that located vulnerable images inside their container registry quickly. The procedure helped them stay focused and avoid tremendous stress and time waste under their high-stakes situation.

A registry functions as a vital security gateway which imposes special responsibility when operating cloud-based registries including AWS ECR.

Practical implementation:

• Cloud registry systems like AWS ECR Enhanced Scanning should have their built-in scanning capabilities enabled by the organization.
• The system should synchronize its vulnerability identification with the discovery of new issues in current images
• A systematic method must exist to examine scan results while also managing their triage process.
• Enter the registry to perform complete scans of all images including those obtained from Docker Hub

Case Study: “When my team discovered a critical vulnerability in a database image we used, we quickly identified every application using that image through our registry scanning system. We prioritized updates based on production exposure and had everything patched within hours instead of days.”

Remember: scanning results are only useful if you act on them. Establish a clear process to review findings and drive remediation.

3. Deploy Stage: Your Security Safety Net

What happens when someone tries to deploy a vulnerable container? Your Kubernetes admission controls can be your last line of defense.

Enhance this with read-only root filesystems, which prevent attackers from writing into the container even if it’s compromised.

Practical implementation:

• Deploy admission controllers (like OPA, Kyverno) to check images before they run
• Implement policies that reject images with critical vulnerabilities
• Add image signature verification to ensure only approved images run
• Ensure containers run with readOnlyRootFilesystem: true
• Start in "monitor mode" before enforcing to avoid blocking legitimate work

Here's a simplified Kyverno policy example:

‍

apiVersion: kyverno.io/v1
kind: ClusterPolicy
metadata:
  name: block-vulnerable-images
spec:
  validationFailureAction: enforce
  rules:
  - name: check-vulnerability-level
    match:
      resources:
        kinds:
        - Pod
    validate:
      message: "Image has critical vulnerabilities"
      deny:
        conditions:
        - key: "{{ images.*.vulnerabilityLevel || 'none' }}"
          operator: Equals
          value: "critical"

  

‍

This approach creates a powerful safety net. Even if a vulnerable image somehow makes it to your registry, it won't actually run in your cluster.

4. Runtime Stage: Continuous Protection

The container security journey doesn't end at deployment. New vulnerabilities emerge daily—what was secure yesterday might be vulnerable today.

Add an eBPF-based runtime observability layer for deep, agentless insights into system calls and container behaviors.

Practical implementation:

• Implement continuous monitoring for newly discovered vulnerabilities
• Use tools like Cilium Tetragon or Falco
• Monitor syscall behaviors, DNS anomalies, and unexpected process spawns
• Prevent "image drift" with immutable containers and regular redeployments
• Maintain your registry by removing or archiving old, vulnerable images

‍

Choosing the Right Tools: A Practical Guide

Open Source Champions

Trivy: 

My favourite scanning tool, it's quick, lightweight, and very flexible; with just one command, I can scan anything from Docker images and Git repositories to Kubernetes clusters and IaC configurations. It's incredibly easy to use, seamlessly fits into CI/CD workflows, and provides me with noise-free, actionable information. I find it particularly unique because it integrates vulnerability scanning, misconfiguration checks, and SBOM creation into a single tool, which makes it ideal for protecting contemporary cloud-native settings without requiring complicated setup or a jumble of plugins.

Grype: 

Another reliable, hassle-free vulnerability scanner that excels in depth and accuracy is Grype, particularly if you're already a part of the Anchore ecosystem. It is an excellent option for accurate, ecosystem-aligned scanning since it works well with Syft for SBOM generation and takes advantage of Anchore's dependable vulnerability feed.

When to use which: For most teams starting out, Trivy offers the best balance of capability and simplicity. If you need official SBOMs or work with compliance teams, Grype+Syft makes a strong combination.

Cloud Provider Tools

Native scanning is available on every cloud platform:

AWS enable Scanning: AWS image scanning, primarily through Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR) which automatically scans container images in the registry after every push (or else as configured) and its integration with other AWS services like Amazon Security Hub, Inspector helps identify software vulnerabilities in container images, enabling security assessments and remediation

Google Artifact Registry: Integrates with Google's Container Analysis service.

Azure Container Registry: Works with Microsoft Defender for scanning and Azure Sentinel for better log query , alerting automations.

These are convenient if you're all-in on a specific cloud, but may not work for multi-cloud scenarios.

Commercial Solutions

For enterprise needs:

Snyk Container: Excels at developer integration with fix advice. It can actually suggest less vulnerable base images.

Anchore Enterprise: Adds policy management and compliance reporting to their open-source tools.

Prisma Cloud: Comprehensive container security with admission control features.

‍

Real-World Lessons and Best Practices

Here are few practices that actually make a difference:

1. Use Multiple Layers of Defense

No single scan point is foolproof. When building a secure container system, always implement:

• Local scans conducted by developers for prompt response
• CI/CD pipeline scanned for all builds
• Registry scanning for inventory tracking
• Kubernetes admission control 

When Log4Shell hit, this layered approach meant the team could identify vulnerable images, prevent new vulnerable deployments, and track remediation progress from a single console.

2(a). Make Base Images Minimal and Keep Them Updated

One team I worked with managed to cut down their vulnerabilities by 70% just by switching from full Ubuntu images to the slim versions. It was a simple change, but it made a huge difference. In container security, less really is more.

‍

# Instead of this

FROM python:3.9-slim

‍

# Use this

FROM python:3.9-slim

‍

Regularly update your base images and treat base image updates as security patches.

2(b). Distroless Images

A powerful but underutilized technique: use distroless base images that contain only your app and its runtime dependencies.

Why it matters: Fewer packages = fewer CVEs = less attack surface.

Google runs its own distroless project -  gcr.io/distroless/base, etc.

3. Make Scanning a Developer Habit, Not a Security Bottleneck

The most successful container security tools I've seen make scanning easy for developers.. Provide clear, actionable feedback and fix recommendations. Some teams even gamify the process with leaderboards for teams with the fewest vulnerabilities.

4. Prioritize What’s Relevant

Not every vulnerability is the same. Pay attention to:

• Flaws in the packages that your application actually utilises
• weaknesses that can be exploited using known attacks
• Vulnerabilities made public by outside networks

This risk-based strategy keeps teams focused on the important things and avoids security weariness.

5. Image Signing for Supply Chain Security

Once basic scanning has been established, use image verification and signing (with tools like Cosign). This guarantees that only trusted images exist in your environment and prevents tampering.

Special Tip: Time-Based Auto Expiry for Images or Pods

• Like ephemeral secrets, containers should have a brief lifespan.
• For jobs, use ttlSecondsAfterFinished in Kubernetes.
• Use CI/CD automation to rotate production images every X days.

‍

Conclusion

As serverless containers, microservices, and continuous deployment become more popular, container environments will only get more dynamic. The layered "Container Shield" strategy can significantly lower risk without stifling innovation if it is applied throughout the lifetime.

If you're looking to dive deeper and learn container security best practices, this guide offers structured paths to upskill and stay ahead in securing containerized environments.

Recall:

• Do frequent and early scans.
• Wherever possible, automate
• Make security obvious without being intrusive.
• As the container ecosystem develops, keep learning.

I hope you can use these helpful recommendations to create your own Container Shield.

Secure your containers the easier way with proven strategies that fit your CI/CD workflows. Book a strategy call with we45 to build a lifecycle security program that actually works in production.